Lovable, the Stockholm-based "vibe coding" startup, announced a $330 million Series B that values the company at $6.6 billion — nearly quadrupling its $1.8 billion valuation from just five months ago. CapitalG (Google's growth fund) and Menlo Ventures led the round, with strategic participation from Nvidia, Salesforce Ventures, Databricks Ventures, and Atlassian Ventures.
The company hit $200 million ARR in November — just four months after crossing $100 million — making it one of the fastest-scaling software companies ever. Founded in late 2023 by Anton Osika and Fabian Hedin, Lovable enables users to build functional applications by describing what they want in plain language.
This isn't just a growth round — it's a distribution play. When Salesforce Ventures, Databricks Ventures, Atlassian Ventures, and HubSpot Ventures all write checks into a coding tool, they're not just betting on the technology. They're positioning for integration partnerships.
For enterprise buyers, this matters. These strategic investors represent the platforms where your internal tools need to live. Lovable building "deeper integrations with third-party apps" isn't vaporware when the vendors themselves are on the cap table.
Anton Osika isn't a first-time founder chasing a trend. He previously co-founded Depict.ai (raised $20M, YC-backed), worked at CERN, and created GPT Engineer — an open-source project that hit 50,000+ GitHub stars and essentially proved the vibe coding thesis before Lovable commercialized it.
Fabian Hedin developed the computer interface used by Stephen Hawking and worked with ex-SpaceX engineers on assistive technology. Both founders have signed the Founders Pledge, committing half their potential proceeds to charitable causes.
This is a team that's shipped before, understands technical users, and has conviction beyond the current hype cycle.
Here's what most coverage misses: Lovable isn't competing directly with Cursor for developers. Their positioning — "99% of the world's best ideas are trapped in the heads of people who can't code" — targets a different buyer entirely.
That means less head-to-head competition with the $29 billion gorilla in the room, and access to budget holders (business leaders, ops teams, product managers) who've never had a line item for development tools before.
$1M to $100M ARR in eight months. $100M to $200M in four more months. Over 100,000 new projects daily. More than 25 million projects created in year one.
These aren't just impressive numbers — they're validating a new category of buyer behavior. Enterprise names like Klarna, Uber, and Zendesk are listed as customers, suggesting the platform has crossed beyond hobbyists into legitimate business use cases.
Most European unicorns relocate to the US as soon as they can justify it. Lovable is opening offices in Boston and San Francisco but keeping headquarters in Stockholm. As Osika has noted publicly, this lets them recruit from a different talent pool while maintaining operational advantages.
Whether this holds as they scale enterprise sales remains to be seen, but it's a deliberate choice worth watching.
At $6.6 billion on ~$200M ARR, Lovable is trading at roughly 33x revenue. For context, Cursor reached $29.3 billion at approximately 29x their $1B+ ARR — and they're serving professional developers with presumably higher retention and enterprise penetration.
The bet here is that Lovable's growth rate justifies the premium. But if the non-technical user base churns faster than expected, or if AI model improvements commoditize the underlying capability, that multiple compresses violently.
In November, Lovable was called out for not paying VAT — the tax that applies to most goods and services in the EU. Osika confirmed this on LinkedIn, saying they would remedy the situation.
For a company moving toward enterprise sales, basic tax compliance isn't optional. Procurement teams at Fortune 500 companies will notice. This is the kind of operational debt that becomes material when you're selling six-figure contracts.
Cursor ($29.3B valuation, $1B+ ARR), Replit ($3B valuation, $150M ARR), Vercel ($9.3B valuation), and even the foundation model companies (OpenAI's Codex, Anthropic's Claude Code) are all attacking variations of this market.
Lovable's differentiation — targeting non-technical users with fully deployable apps — is compelling but also means they're building a two-sided moat: they need to stay ahead on AI capability while also building the "last mile" infrastructure (databases, payments, hosting) that makes apps production-ready.
That's a lot of surface area to defend.
Here's what enterprise GTM leaders should recognize: vibe coding isn't just a developer productivity story anymore. It's creating an entirely new category of internal tool builders — product managers, ops leaders, and business analysts who can now ship functional software without engineering resources.
The implications for enterprise software buying are significant:
Budget reallocation — If business units can build 80% of their internal tools without IT, where does that budget go?
Shadow IT acceleration — The governance challenges are obvious. How do you maintain security, compliance, and data policies when anyone can spin up a production app?
Vendor strategy shifts — The strategic investors in this round (Salesforce, Databricks, Atlassian) are hedging against their own platforms becoming commoditized. That tells you where they think value is migrating.
Lovable's $6.6 billion valuation isn't about a coding tool — it's a bet that the addressable market for software creation is about to expand by 10-100x as technical barriers collapse.
For enterprise buyers: watch the enterprise feature roadmap carefully over the next two quarters. If Lovable can solve the governance, security, and integration challenges that business-led development creates, they could become as essential as Figma became for design.
For AI founders: the strategic investor syndicate here is a masterclass in using venture capital as a distribution strategy. That's the playbook to study.
What's your enterprise doing about the "citizen developer" wave? I'd bet most IT orgs are underestimating how fast this is moving.
.svg)
